↓ Skip to main content

Environmental remodelling of GABAergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission: Rise of the anoxia-tolerant turtle brain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thermal Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental remodelling of GABAergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission: Rise of the anoxia-tolerant turtle brain
Published in
Journal of Thermal Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.01.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

D.W. Hogg, P.J. Hawrysh, L.T. Buck

Abstract

Climate cooling over the past one hundred thousand years has resulted in seasonal ice cover at northern and southern latitudes that has selected for hypoxia and anoxia tolerance in some species, such as freshwater turtles. At the northern reaches of their range, North American freshwater turtles spend 4 months or more buried in the mud bottom of ice covered lakes and ponds. From a comparative perspective this gives us the opportunity to understand how an extremely oxygen-sensitive organ, such as the vertebrate brain, can function without oxygen for long periods. Brain function is based on complex excitatory (on) and inhibitory (off) circuits involving the major neurotransmitters glutamate and, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) respectively. When a mammalian brain becomes anoxic, glutamate levels rise within minutes resulting in excitotoxic cell death which does not occur in anoxic turtle brain. The response in turtle brain has been remodelled - GABA levels rise rapidly resulting in large inhibitory GABA receptor currents and inhibition of glutamate receptor function that together depress neuronal activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 22%
Professor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 44%
Neuroscience 5 19%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,443,044
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Biology
#271
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,869
of 323,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Biology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.