↓ Skip to main content

Natural History and Management of HFE-Hemochromatosis

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Liver Disease, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural History and Management of HFE-Hemochromatosis
Published in
Seminars in Liver Disease, September 2011
DOI 10.1055/s-0031-1286060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eng Gan, Lawrie Powell, John Olynyk

Abstract

Advances in our knowledge of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) over the past 150 years have revealed new insights into this common genetic disorder. Meticulous family and HLA association studies followed ultimately by cloning of the HFE gene have dramatically changed our understanding of the natural history and manifestations of HH. Cross-sectional studies demonstrated that HH had a highly variable clinical and biochemical penetrance in susceptible individuals of northern European descent. "State-of-the-art" large longitudinal population studies have accurately defined the natural history. We now recognize that HH is not as discreet an entity as previously thought because genetic and environmental modifiers of disease penetrance are increasingly identified as influencing the clinical course of HH. While phlebotomy remains the cornerstone of therapy, our diagnostic approach has been refined to incorporate new biochemical, genetic, and noninvasive methods that complement more traditional approaches. This review aims to encapsulate this new knowledge in a framework that addresses commonly raised issues relating to the current natural history, diagnosis, and management of HH patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 16 35%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Liver Disease
#458
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,973
of 125,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Liver Disease
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.