You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004 |
| Authors |
Christopher P. Barber, Mark A. Cochrane, Carlos M. Souza, William F. Laurance |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 972 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 946 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 185 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 154 | 16% |
| Researcher | 134 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 119 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 61 | 6% |
| Other | 146 | 15% |
| Unknown | 173 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 341 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 198 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 59 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 44 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 3% |
| Other | 81 | 8% |
| Unknown | 215 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 451. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#62,309
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#38
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#466
of 251,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.