↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea: Sequencing a Myriad of Type Strains

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
98 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea: Sequencing a Myriad of Type Strains
Published in
PLoS Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001920
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikos C Kyrpides, Philip Hugenholtz, Jonathan A Eisen, Tanja Woyke, Markus Göker, Charles T Parker, Rudolf Amann, Brian J Beck, Patrick S G Chain, Jongsik Chun, Rita R Colwell, Antoine Danchin, Peter Dawyndt, Tom Dedeurwaerdere, Edward F DeLong, John C Detter, Paul De Vos, Timothy J Donohue, Xiu-Zhu Dong, Dusko S Ehrlich, Claire Fraser, Richard Gibbs, Jack Gilbert, Paul Gilna, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Janet K Jansson, Jay D Keasling, Rob Knight, David Labeda, Alla Lapidus, Jung-Sook Lee, Wen-Jun Li, Juncai Ma, Victor Markowitz, Edward R B Moore, Mark Morrison, Folker Meyer, Karen E Nelson, Moriya Ohkuma, Christos A Ouzounis, Norman Pace, Julian Parkhill, Nan Qin, Ramon Rossello-Mora, Johannes Sikorski, David Smith, Mitch Sogin, Rick Stevens, Uli Stingl, Ken-Ichiro Suzuki, Dorothea Taylor, Jim M Tiedje, Brian Tindall, Michael Wagner, George Weinstock, Jean Weissenbach, Owen White, Jun Wang, Lixin Zhang, Yu-Guang Zhou, Dawn Field, William B Whitman, George M Garrity, Hans-Peter Klenk

Abstract

Microbes hold the key to life. They hold the secrets to our past (as the descendants of the earliest forms of life) and the prospects for our future (as we mine their genes for solutions to some of the planet's most pressing problems, from global warming to antibiotic resistance). However, the piecemeal approach that has defined efforts to study microbial genetic diversity for over 20 years and in over 30,000 genome projects risks squandering that promise. These efforts have covered less than 20% of the diversity of the cultured archaeal and bacterial species, which represent just 15% of the overall known prokaryotic diversity. Here we call for the funding of a systematic effort to produce a comprehensive genomic catalog of all cultured Bacteria and Archaea by sequencing, where available, the type strain of each species with a validly published name (currently∼11,000). This effort will provide an unprecedented level of coverage of our planet's genetic diversity, allow for the large-scale discovery of novel genes and functions, and lead to an improved understanding of microbial evolution and function in the environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 5%
Germany 8 2%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 306 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 23%
Professor 32 9%
Student > Master 29 8%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 31 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 16%
Environmental Science 22 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 39 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#581,026
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#1,142
of 9,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,327
of 241,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#17
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.