| Title |
Changes in carbon stock following soil scarification of non-wooded stands in Hokkaido, northern Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Forest Research, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10310-010-0204-y |
| Authors |
Keiichi Aoyama, Toshiya Yoshida, Akane Harada, Mahoko Noguchi, Hisashi Miya, Hideaki Shibata |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forest Research
#174
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,813
of 420,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forest Research
#78
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.