You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Critical Role of the Pathologist in Determining Eligibility for Active Surveillance as a Management Option in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Consensus Statement With Recommendations Supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, the New Zealand Society of Pathologists and the Prostate Cancer Foundation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.5858/arpa.2014-0219-sa |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mahul B Amin, Daniel W Lin, John L Gore, John R Srigley, Hema Samaratunga, Lars Egevad, Mark Rubin, John Nacey, H Ballentine Carter, Laurence Klotz, Howard Sandler, Anthony L Zietman, Stuart Holden, Rodolfo Montironi, Peter A Humphrey, Andrew J Evans, Jonathan I Epstein, Brett Delahunt, Jesse K McKenney, Dan Berney, Thomas M Wheeler, Arul M Chinnaiyan, Lawrence True, Beatrice Knudsen, M Elizabeth H Hammond |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 45% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 5% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 35% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 28% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2015.
All research outputs
#749,050
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#100
of 2,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,046
of 245,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.