You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epipalaeolithic occupation and palaeoenvironments of the southern Nefud desert, Saudi Arabia, during the Terminal Pleistocene and Early Holocene
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.07.023 |
| Authors |
Yamandú H. Hilbert, Tom S. White, Ash Parton, Laine Clark-Balzan, Rémy Crassard, Huw S. Groucutt, Richard P. Jennings, Paul Breeze, Adrian Parker, Ceri Shipton, Abdulaziz Al-Omari, Abdullah M. Alsharekh, Michael D. Petraglia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 20 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,798,136
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#731
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,271
of 265,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#17
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.