↓ Skip to main content

Effects of magnesium deficiency – More than skin deep

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of magnesium deficiency – More than skin deep
Published in
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1177/1535370214537745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Navin Chandrakanth Chandrasekaran, Christopher Weir, Sumaya Alfraji, Jeff Grice, Michael S Roberts, Ross T Barnard

Abstract

Dead Sea and magnesium salt therapy are two of the oldest forms of treatment for skin disease and several other disorders, supported by a body of largely anecdotal evidence. In this paper we review possible pathways for penetration of magnesium ions through the epidermis to reach the circulation, in turn replenishing cellular magnesium levels. We also discuss mechanisms for intercellular movement of magnesium ions and possible mechanisms for the interaction between magnesium ions and inflammatory mediators. Upon addition of magnesium ions in vitro, the expression of inflammatory mediators such as tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) and nuclear factor κβ (NFκβ) is down regulated. Dysregulation of these and other inflammatory mediators has been linked to several inflammatory disorders, including asthma, arthritis, atherosclerosis and neuroinflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 28%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,406,371
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#893
of 3,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,285
of 228,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#10
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.