↓ Skip to main content

Summary of session C1: pulsar timing arrays

Overview of attention for article published in General Relativity and Gravitation, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Summary of session C1: pulsar timing arrays
Published in
General Relativity and Gravitation, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10714-014-1765-4
Authors

R. M. Shannon, S. Chamberlin, N. J. Cornish, J. A. Ellis, C. M. F. Mingarelli, D. Perrodin, P. Rosado, A. Sesana, S. R. Taylor, L. Wen, C. G. Bassa, J. Gair, G. H. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, M. Kramer, K. J. Lee, K. Liu, I. Mandel, M. Purver, T. Sidery, R. Smits, B. W. Stappers, A. Vecchio

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 50%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,383,782
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#999
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,888
of 229,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.