↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Etiology and Management of HIV-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the Etiology and Management of HIV-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11904-014-0211-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kara Stavros, David M. Simpson

Abstract

HIV may cause several forms of peripheral neuropathy, the most common of which is distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) characterized by pain and sensory deficits in a stocking-glove distribution. The pathophysiology of DSP remains largely unknown but is thought to be related both to the neurotoxicity of HIV-through indirect immunomodulatory mechanisms-and to the neurotoxic effects of anti-retroviral therapies, most notably the dideoxynucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors or so-called d-drugs. Determining whether symptoms arise from the virus or the treatment poses a challenge to the clinician who must decide if a patient's HAART regimen should be altered. Treatment of symptoms related to HIV-DSP is a difficult task and there is no evidence that the traditional agents used in chronic neuropathic pain are efficacious in the HIV-DSP population. Indeed few pharmacologic agents have proven efficacy in HIV-DSP - these include cannabis and the capsaicin 8 % dermal patch. As such, alternative, non-pharmacologic therapies are being investigated. More research is needed to further elucidate the complex pathophysiology of HIV-DSP which may yield additional therapies for these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 84 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 43%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#374
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,622
of 227,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.