↓ Skip to main content

Clinical implications of antibiotic pharmacokinetic principles in the critically ill

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical implications of antibiotic pharmacokinetic principles in the critically ill
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-3088-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew A. Udy, Jason A. Roberts, Jeffrey Lipman

Abstract

Successful antibiotic therapy in the critically ill requires sufficient drug concentrations at the site of infection that kill or suppress bacterial growth. The relationship between antibiotic exposure and achieving the above effects is referred to as pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). The associated indices therefore provide logical targets for optimal antibiotic therapy. While dosing regimens to achieve such targets have largely been established from studies in animals and non-critically ill patients, they are often poorly validated in the ICU. Endothelial dysfunction, capillary leak, altered major organ blood flow, deranged plasma protein concentrations, extremes of body habitus, the application of extracorporeal support modalities, and a higher prevalence of intermediate susceptibility, independently, and in combination, significantly confound successful antibiotic treatment in this setting. As such, the prescription of standard doses are likely to result in sub-therapeutic concentrations, which in turn may promote treatment failure or the selection of resistant pathogens. This review article considers these issues in detail, summarizing the key changes in antibiotic PK/PD in the critically ill, and suggesting alternative dosing strategies that may improve antibiotic therapy in these challenging patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 191 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 12%
Other 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 55 27%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 54 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,765,716
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,060
of 5,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,037
of 214,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#28
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.