| Title |
Constructing a Code of Ethics: An Experiential Case of a National Professional Organization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-009-0347-y |
| Authors |
Carla Masciocchi Messikomer, Carol Cabrey Cirka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 31 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 19% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,233,547
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,812
of 2,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,092
of 164,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#37
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.