Title |
A qualitative study on barriers to utilisation of institutional delivery services in Moroto and Napak districts, Uganda: implications for programming
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-259 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Calistus Wilunda, Gianluca Quaglio, Giovanni Putoto, Peter Lochoro, Giovanni Dall’Oglio, Fabio Manenti, Andrea Atzori, Rose Miligan Lochiam, Risa Takahashi, Aline Mukundwa, Koyejo Oyerinde |
Abstract |
Skilled attendance at delivery is critical in prevention of maternal deaths. However, many women in low- and middle-income countries still deliver without skilled assistance. This study was carried out to identify perceived barriers to utilisation of institutional delivery in two districts in Karamoja, Uganda. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | <1% |
Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 213 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 57 | 26% |
Researcher | 28 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
Other | 41 | 19% |
Unknown | 38 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 12% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Engineering | 5 | 2% |
Other | 32 | 15% |
Unknown | 44 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,783,222
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,843
of 4,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,480
of 229,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#78
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.