Title |
Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, June 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. Chave, C. Andalo, S. Brown, M. A. Cairns, J. Q. Chambers, D. Eamus, H. Fölster, F. Fromard, N. Higuchi, T. Kira, J.-P. Lescure, B. W. Nelson, H. Ogawa, H. Puig, B. Riéra, T. Yamakura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,723 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 32 | <1% |
Brazil | 27 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 15 | <1% |
Spain | 9 | <1% |
Colombia | 7 | <1% |
Germany | 7 | <1% |
Japan | 7 | <1% |
Peru | 6 | <1% |
Malaysia | 5 | <1% |
Other | 60 | 2% |
Unknown | 3548 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 663 | 18% |
Researcher | 554 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 549 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 381 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 240 | 6% |
Other | 622 | 17% |
Unknown | 714 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1182 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1137 | 31% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 261 | 7% |
Engineering | 103 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 36 | <1% |
Other | 178 | 5% |
Unknown | 826 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,815,678
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#679
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,519
of 69,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.