↓ Skip to main content

The Association Between Therapeutic Horseback Riding and the Social Communication and Sensory Reactions of Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
Title
The Association Between Therapeutic Horseback Riding and the Social Communication and Sensory Reactions of Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1773-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra C. Ward, Kelly Whalon, Katrina Rusnak, Kimberly Wendell, Nancy Paschall

Abstract

This study investigated the association between therapeutic riding (TR) and the social communication and sensory processing skills of 21 elementary students with autism attending TR as part of a school group. An interrupted treatment design was employed to determine whether children were able to maintain treatment effects following the removal of TR. Teacher ratings indicated that participating children with autism significantly increased their social interaction, improved their sensory processing, and decreased the severity of symptoms associated with autism spectrum disorders following TR. Gains were not maintained consistently after two 6-week breaks from TR, but were recovered once TR was reinstated. Potential explanations regarding the benefits of TR are discussed, and suggestions for future research provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 443 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 109 24%
Student > Master 68 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Student > Postgraduate 27 6%
Researcher 25 6%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 114 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 12%
Social Sciences 43 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 5%
Other 54 12%
Unknown 126 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#13,940,461
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,390
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,954
of 288,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#31
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.