↓ Skip to main content

Volume of supervised exercise training impacts glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
Volume of supervised exercise training impacts glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis
Published in
Diabetologia, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00125-012-2774-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Umpierre, P. A. B. Ribeiro, B. D. Schaan, J. P. Ribeiro

Abstract

Supervised exercise programmes improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes, but training characteristics associated with reduction in HbA(1c) remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review with meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the association between intensity and volume of exercise training (aerobic, resistance or combined) and HbA(1c) changes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 295 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Master 41 14%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 23 8%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 66 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 24%
Sports and Recreations 59 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 73 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,480,508
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#3,035
of 5,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,822
of 183,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.