↓ Skip to main content

The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2443 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
805 Mendeley
Title
The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morten Schmidt, Lars Pedersen, Henrik Toft Sørensen

Abstract

The methodological advances in epidemiology have facilitated the use of the Danish Civil Registration System (CRS) in ways not previously described systematically. We reviewed the CRS and its use as a research tool in epidemiology. We obtained information from the Danish Law on Civil Registration and the Central Office of Civil Registration, and used existing literature to provide illustrative examples of its use. The CRS is an administrative register established on April 2, 1968. It contains individual-level information on all persons residing in Denmark (and Greenland as of May 1, 1972). By January 2014, the CRS had cumulatively registered 9.5 million individuals and more than 400 million person-years of follow-up. A unique ten-digit Civil Personal Register number assigned to all persons in the CRS allows for technically easy, cost-effective, and unambiguous individual-level record linkage of Danish registers. Daily updated information on migration and vital status allows for nationwide cohort studies with virtually complete long-term follow-up on emigration and death. The CRS facilitates sampling of general population comparison cohorts, controls in case-control studies, family cohorts, and target groups in population surveys. The data in the CRS are virtually complete, have high accuracy, and can be retrieved for research purposes while protecting the anonymity of Danish residents. In conclusion, the CRS is a key tool for epidemiological research in Denmark.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 805 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 6 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 797 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 201 25%
Researcher 120 15%
Student > Master 98 12%
Student > Bachelor 52 6%
Other 40 5%
Other 91 11%
Unknown 203 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 381 47%
Social Sciences 23 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 2%
Unspecified 15 2%
Other 87 11%
Unknown 260 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,704,873
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#260
of 1,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,577
of 246,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.