| Title |
Flying Insect Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Behavior, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10905-014-9454-4 |
| Authors |
Yanping Chen, Adena Why, Gustavo Batista, Agenor Mafra-Neto, Eamonn Keogh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Researcher | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 26% |
| Engineering | 39 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 31 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#548,905
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Behavior
#3
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,577
of 228,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Behavior
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them