↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the generalizability of the Organizational Constraints Analysis framework: a hospital bed management case study

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, Technology & Work, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the generalizability of the Organizational Constraints Analysis framework: a hospital bed management case study
Published in
Cognition, Technology & Work, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10111-013-0260-0
Authors

Tania Xiao, Penelope Sanderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Computer Science 4 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,385
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Cognition, Technology & Work
#117
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,921
of 197,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition, Technology & Work
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.