↓ Skip to main content

Language Assessment and Development in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
369 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
624 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Language Assessment and Development in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0510-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhiannon J. Luyster, Mary Beth Kadlec, Alice Carter, Helen Tager-Flusberg

Abstract

One of the primary diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is the presence of a language delay or impairment. Children with ASD are now being identified at significantly younger ages, and prior research has consistently found that early language skills in this population are heterogeneous and an important predictor for later outcome. The goal of this study was to systematically investigate language in toddlers with ASD and to identify early correlates of receptive and expressive language in this population. The study included 164 toddlers with ASD between the ages of 18 and 33 months who were evaluated on several cognitive, language and behavioral measures. Results suggested good agreement among different measures of early language, including direct assessment and parent report measures. Significant concurrent predictors of receptive language included gestures, non-verbal cognitive ability and response to joint attention. For expressive language, the most significant predictors were non-verbal cognitive ability, gestures and imitation. These findings have important implications for intervention programs targeting this population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 601 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 122 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 19%
Student > Bachelor 63 10%
Researcher 60 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 7%
Other 115 18%
Unknown 102 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 222 36%
Social Sciences 65 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 7%
Linguistics 36 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 5%
Other 96 15%
Unknown 132 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,090,818
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,258
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,262
of 161,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.