↓ Skip to main content

Deodorants and antiperspirants affect the axillary bacterial community

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Dermatological Research, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Deodorants and antiperspirants affect the axillary bacterial community
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00403-014-1487-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Callewaert, Prawira Hutapea, Tom Van de Wiele, Nico Boon

Abstract

The use of underarm cosmetics is common practice in the Western society to obtain better body odor and/or to prevent excessive sweating. A survey indicated that 95 % of the young adult Belgians generally use an underarm deodorant or antiperspirant. The effect of deodorants and antiperspirants on the axillary bacterial community was examined on nine healthy subjects, who were restrained from using deodorant/antiperspirant for 1 month. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis was used to investigate the individual microbial dynamics. The microbial profiles were unique for every person. A stable bacterial community was seen when underarm cosmetics were applied on a daily basis and when no underarm cosmetics were applied. A distinct community difference was seen when the habits were changed from daily use to no use of deodorant/antiperspirant and vice versa. The richness was higher when deodorants and antiperspirants were applied. Especially when antiperspirants were applied, the microbiome showed an increase in diversity. Antiperspirant usage led toward an increase of Actinobacteria, which is an unfavorable situation with respect to body odor development. These initial results show that axillary cosmetics modify the microbial community and can stimulate odor-producing bacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 47 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Chemistry 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#135,838
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#4
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,061
of 239,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.