| Title |
The impact of HIV/SRH service integration on workload: analysis from the Integra Initiative in two African settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sedona Sweeney, Carol Dayo Obure, Fern Terris-Prestholt, Vanessa Darsamo, Christine Michaels-Igbokwe, Esther Muketo, Zelda Nhlabatsi, Charlotte Warren, Susannah Mayhew, Charlotte Watts, Anna Vassall, the Integra Research Team |
| Abstract |
There is growing interest in integration of HIV and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services as a way to improve the efficiency of human resources (HR) for health in low- and middle-income countries. Although this is supported by a wealth of evidence on the acceptability and clinical effectiveness of service integration, there is little evidence on whether staff in general health services can easily absorb HIV services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,913,296
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#979
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,552
of 241,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.