↓ Skip to main content

Linking the shapes of alphabet letters to their sounds: the case of Hebrew

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Linking the shapes of alphabet letters to their sounds: the case of Hebrew
Published in
Reading and Writing, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11145-010-9286-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Treiman, Iris Levin, Brett Kessler

Abstract

Learning the sounds of letters is an important part of learning a writing system. Most previous studies of this process have examined English, focusing on variations in the phonetic iconicity of letter names as a reason why some letter sounds (such as that of b, where the sound is at the beginning of the letter's name) are easier to learn than others (such as that of w, where the sound is not in the name). The present study examined Hebrew, where variations in the phonetic iconicity of letter names are minimal. In a study of 391 Israeli children with a mean age of 5 years, 10 months, we used multilevel models to examine the factors that are associated with knowledge of letter sounds. One set of factors involved letter names: Children sometimes attributed to a letter a consonant-vowel sound consisting of the first phonemes of the letter's name. A second set of factors involved contrast: Children had difficulty when there was relatively little contrast in shape between one letter and others. Frequency was also important, encompassing both child-specific effects, such as a benefit for the first letter of a child's forename, and effects that held true across children, such as a benefit for the first letters of the alphabet. These factors reflect general properties of human learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 31%
Linguistics 7 20%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#17,406,668
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#626
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,308
of 191,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.