| Title |
Outcome Predictors for Conservative Patellofemoral Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-014-0231-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Lack, Christian Barton, Bill Vicenzino, Dylan Morrissey |
| Abstract |
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is highly prevalent within both sporting and recreationally active populations. Multiple treatment approaches have been advocated for the management of PFP, attempting to address both intrinsic and extrinsic factors thought to contribute to the development and persistence of pain. A number of predictors of treatment success have been proposed, and evaluated, for directing intervention choice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
| Scientists | 8 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 22% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,925,133
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,329
of 2,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,201
of 231,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#28
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.