↓ Skip to main content

Centennial changes in North Pacific anoxia linked to tropical trade winds

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Centennial changes in North Pacific anoxia linked to tropical trade winds
Published in
Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1252332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Curtis Deutsch, William Berelson, Robert Thunell, Thomas Weber, Caitlin Tems, James McManus, John Crusius, Taka Ito, Timothy Baumgartner, Vicente Ferreira, Jacob Mey, Alexander van Geen

Abstract

Climate warming is expected to reduce oxygen (O2) supply to the ocean and expand its oxygen minimum zones (OMZs). We reconstructed variations in the extent of North Pacific anoxia since 1850 using a geochemical proxy for denitrification (δ(15)N) from multiple sediment cores. Increasing δ(15)N since ~1990 records an expansion of anoxia, consistent with observed O2 trends. However, this was preceded by a longer declining δ(15)N trend that implies that the anoxic zone was shrinking for most of the 20th century. Both periods can be explained by changes in winds over the tropical Pacific that drive upwelling, biological productivity, and O2 demand within the OMZ. If equatorial Pacific winds resume their predicted weakening trend, the ocean's largest anoxic zone will contract despite a global O2 decline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 301 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 19%
Student > Master 38 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 62 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 112 35%
Environmental Science 42 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 9%
Engineering 18 6%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 80 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#456,306
of 23,873,054 outputs
Outputs from Science
#10,933
of 79,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,338
of 233,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#146
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.