| Title |
Artificial watering points are focal points for activity by an invasive herbivore but not native herbivores in conservation reserves in arid Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0770-y |
| Authors |
Mike Letnic, Shawn W. Laffan, Aaron C. Greenville, Benjamin G. Russell, Bruce Mitchell, Peter J. S. Fleming |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,886,659
of 23,915,168 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,126
of 2,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,308
of 233,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#18
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,915,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.