| Title |
Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10815-013-0139-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Lammers, C. Splingart, P. Barrière, M. Jean, T. Fréour |
| Abstract |
Despite controversy regarding its clinical value, male fertility investigation mainly relies on semen analysis. Even though reference guidelines are available, manual sperm analysis still suffers from analytical variability, thus questioning the interest of automated sperm analysis systems. The aim of this study is to compared automated computerized semen analysis systems (SQA-V GOLD and CASA CEROS) to the conventional manual method in terms of accuracy and precision. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,072,498
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#47
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,880
of 192,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.