↓ Skip to main content

Effect of skin coatings on prolonging shelf life of kagzi lime fruits (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Food Science and Technology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Effect of skin coatings on prolonging shelf life of kagzi lime fruits (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle)
Published in
Journal of Food Science and Technology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13197-010-0214-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhay Bisen, Sailendra Kumar Pandey, Neha Patel

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess the influence of chemical and oil coatings on storage life of kagzi lime fruits. Fruits were harvested at physiological light green mature stage and treated with different concentrations of chemicals viz., Cacl2 and KMnO4 and edible coatings viz., (coconut oil, mustard oil, sesamum oil, castor oil and liquid paraffin wax). After treatment, fruits were kept at ambient condition (25-30 °C, 60-70% RH) till 18 days and analyzed for various physical and chemical parameters like PLW, marketable fruits retained, TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, juice content and also organoleptic values. The results revealed that edible oil emulsion coating particularly coconut oil had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) effect on reduction of the physiological loss in weight (9.67%) and maximum marketable fruits retained (70%), total soluble solids (8.43%), ascorbic acid (49.93 mg/100 ml juice), acidity (1.52%) and juice content (42.34%) of fruits. Similarly, application of this oil emulsion coating acceptable for sensory quality parameters such as appearance, flavour, taste, external colour and no incidence of moulds & their growth up to 18 days of storage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 42%
Chemistry 8 10%
Engineering 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 23 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,223,868
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#123
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,207
of 185,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.