| Title |
Professional centred shared decision making: Patient decision aids in practicein primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-8-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duika Burges Watson, Richard G Thomson, Madeleine J Murtagh |
| Abstract |
Patient decision aids are increasingly regarded as important components of clinical practice that enable shared decision making (SDM) and evidence based patient choice. Despite broad acceptance of their value, there remains little evidence of their successful implementation in primary care settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 29% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,455
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,884
of 156,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.