↓ Skip to main content

New TMS Study Tackles the Challenge of Integrating Materials Simulations Across Length Scales

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
New TMS Study Tackles the Challenge of Integrating Materials Simulations Across Length Scales
Published in
JOM, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11837-014-1078-9
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 7%
Sweden 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 60%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 12 80%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#1,358
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,087
of 229,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.