↓ Skip to main content

A pilot study examining functional brain activity 6 months after memory retraining in MS: the MEMREHAB trial

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 1,154)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
A pilot study examining functional brain activity 6 months after memory retraining in MS: the MEMREHAB trial
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11682-014-9309-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ekaterina Dobryakova, Glenn R. Wylie, John DeLuca, Nancy D. Chiaravalloti

Abstract

Cognitive impairment in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) is now well recognized. One of the most common cognitive deficits is found in memory functioning, largely due to impaired acquisition. We examined functional brain activity 6 months after memory retraining in individuals with MS. The current report presents long term follow-up results from a randomized clinical trial on a memory rehabilitation protocol known as the modified Story Memory Technique. Behavioral memory performance and brain activity of all participants were evaluated at baseline, immediately after treatment, and 6 months after treatment. Results revealed that previously observed increases in patterns of cerebral activation during learning immediately after memory training were maintained 6 months post training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Unspecified 6 6%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#640,186
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#31
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,601
of 228,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them