↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic criteria for bipolarity based on an international sample of 5,635 patients with DSM-IV major depressive episodes

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic criteria for bipolarity based on an international sample of 5,635 patients with DSM-IV major depressive episodes
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00406-011-0228-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Angst, A. Gamma, C. L. Bowden, J. M. Azorin, G. Perugi, E. Vieta, A. H. Young

Abstract

To assess the clinical validity of individual DSM-IV criteria for hypomania. In an international sample of 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes (Bridge Study), DSM-IV criteria for hypomania (stem questions, number and quality of symptoms, duration and exclusion criteria) were systematically assessed and their validity analysed on the basis of clinical data including family history, course, and other clinical characteristics. Three stem questions for hypomania, irritability, elevated mood and the added question of increased activity, showed comparable validity. The results support the current DSM-IV requirement for a higher symptom threshold (4 of 7 hypomanic symptoms) in cases of irritable mood. Longer durations of hypomanic episodes were associated with higher scores on all validators. The results did not support the DSM-IV durational requirements for hypomanic episodes (4 days) and manic episodes (7 days). Brief hypomanic episodes of 1, 2 or 3 days were valid and would meet validity criteria for inclusion. The three exclusion criteria in DSM-IV (hypomania due to the use of antidepressants or of other substances, or to other medical conditions) were found to exclude patients with bipolar depression and should therefore not be retained. These results support several revisions of the DSM-IV concept of hypomanic episodes: specifically, the inclusion of increased activity as a gate question, the inclusion of 1 or 2 to 3-day episodes and the elimination of all exclusion criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 38%
Psychology 10 14%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,218,452
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#414
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,470
of 121,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.