| Title |
Ambivalent Sexism and Power-Related Gender-role Ideology in Marriage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sex Roles, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11199-009-9585-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhixia Chen, Susan T. Fiske, Tiane L. Lee |
| Abstract |
Glick-Fiske's (1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory(ASI) and a new Gender-Role Ideology in Marriage (GRIM) inventory examine ambivalent sexism toward women, predicting power-related, gender-role beliefs about mate selection and marriage norms. Mainland Chinese, 552, and 252 U.S. undergraduates participated. Results indicated that Chinese and men most endorsed hostile sexism; Chinese women more than U.S. women accepted benevolent sexism. Both Chinese genders prefer home-oriented mates (women especially seeking a provider and upholding him; men especially endorsing male-success/female-housework, male dominance, and possibly violence). Both U.S. genders prefer considerate mates (men especially seeking an attractive one). Despite gender and culture differences in means, ASI-GRIM correlations replicate across those subgroups: Benevolence predicts initial mate selection; hostility predicts subsequent marriage norms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 87 | 48% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#694,424
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#196
of 2,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,568
of 106,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.