| Title |
Physical activity differences between children from migrant and native origin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-819 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wim Labree, Freek Lötters, Dike van de Mheen, Frans Rutten, Ana Rivera Chavarría, Madelon Neve, Gerda Rodenburg, Honorine Machielsen, Gerrit Koopmans, Marleen Foets |
| Abstract |
Children from migrant origin are at higher risk for overweight and obesity. As limited physical activity is a key factor in this overweight and obesity risk, in general, the aim of this study is to assess to what degree children from migrant and native Dutch origin differ with regard to levels of physical activity and to determine which home environment aspects contribute to these differences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 21% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,781,379
of 23,940,793 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,140
of 15,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,258
of 234,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#234
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.