Title |
Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-011-2011-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ioannis D. Gelalis, Nikolaos K. Paschos, Emilios E. Pakos, Angelos N. Politis, Christina M. Arnaoutoglou, Athanasios C. Karageorgos, Avraam Ploumis, Theodoros A. Xenakis |
Abstract |
With the advances and improvement of computer-assisted surgery devices, computer-guided pedicle screws insertion has been applied to the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review of all available prospective evidence regarding pedicle screw insertion techniques in the thoracic and lumbar human spine. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 295 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 44 | 15% |
Other | 38 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
Student > Master | 27 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 9% |
Other | 65 | 22% |
Unknown | 72 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 40% |
Engineering | 42 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 18 | 6% |
Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 6% |
Unknown | 90 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,024
of 4,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,063
of 126,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#20
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,680 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.