↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of rebamipide for diclofenac-induced small-intestinal mucosal injuries in healthy subjects: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of rebamipide for diclofenac-induced small-intestinal mucosal injuries in healthy subjects: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00535-007-2155-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasumasa Niwa, Masanao Nakamura, Naoki Ohmiya, Osamu Maeda, Takafumi Ando, Akihiro Itoh, Yoshiki Hirooka, Hidemi Goto

Abstract

Although obscure gastrointestinal bleeding cannot be detected by colonoscopy or upper endoscopy, wireless video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is capable of imaging it. Few data are available on medical therapy for patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced small-intestinal mucosal injuries. The aim of this study was to compare prevention by rebamipide and placebo of NSAID-induced smallintestinal injury in healthy subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Engineering 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,423,242
of 23,738,567 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#672
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,491
of 80,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,738,567 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.