| Title |
Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-017-3865-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Y. Yang, D. S. Manhas, A. F. Howard, R. A. Olson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| Sweden | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 44% |
| Scientists | 23 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,090,061
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#92
of 5,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,701
of 328,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.