↓ Skip to main content

Gene-Environment Interaction in Adults’ IQ Scores: Measures of Past and Present Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Gene-Environment Interaction in Adults’ IQ Scores: Measures of Past and Present Environment
Published in
Behavior Genetics, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10519-008-9212-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie van der Sluis, Gonneke Willemsen, Eco J. C. de Geus, Dorret I. Boomsma, Danielle Posthuma

Abstract

Gene-environment interaction was studied in a sample of young (mean age 26 years, N = 385) and older (mean age 49 years, N = 370) adult males and females. Full scale IQ scores (FSIQ) were analyzed using biometric models in which additive genetic (A), common environmental (C), and unique environmental (E) effects were allowed to depend on environmental measures. Moderators under study were parental and partner educational level, as well as urbanization level and mean real estate price of the participants' residential area. Mean effects were observed for parental education, partner education and urbanization level. On average, FSIQ scores were roughly 5 points higher in participants with highly educated parents, compared to participants whose parents were less well educated. In older participants, IQ scores were about 2 points higher when their partners were highly educated. In younger males, higher urbanization levels were associated with slightly higher FSIQ scores. Our analyses also showed increased common environmental variation in older males whose parents were more highly educated, and increased unique environmental effects in older males living in more affluent areas. Contrary to studies in children, however, the variance attributable to additive genetic effects was stable across all levels of the moderators under study. Most results were replicated for VIQ and PIQ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Netherlands 2 2%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,416,317
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#402
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,589
of 98,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them