↓ Skip to main content

Competition, predation, and migration: individual choice patterns of Serengeti migrants captured by hierarchical models

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Monographs, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
12 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Competition, predation, and migration: individual choice patterns of Serengeti migrants captured by hierarchical models
Published in
Ecological Monographs, August 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-1446.1
Authors

J. Grant C. Hopcraft, J. M. Morales, H. L. Beyer, Markus Borner, Ephraim Mwangomo, A. R. E. Sinclair, Han Olff, Daniel T. Haydon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 269 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 19%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 39 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 147 51%
Environmental Science 61 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 48 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,374,950
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#111
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,333
of 244,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them