You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Resource Utilization and Costs during the Initial Years of Lung Cancer Screening with Computed Tomography in Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/jto.0000000000000283 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonya Cressman, Stephen Lam, Martin C. Tammemagi, William K. Evans, Natasha B. Leighl, Dean A. Regier, Corneliu Bolbocean, Frances A. Shepherd, Ming-Sound Tsao, Daria Manos, Geoffrey Liu, Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra, Ian Cromwell, Michael R. Johnston, John R. Mayo, Annette McWilliams, Christian Couture, John C. English, John Goffin, David M. Hwang, Serge Puksa, Heidi Roberts, Alain Tremblay, Paul MacEachern, Paul Burrowes, Rick Bhatia, Richard J. Finley, Glenwood D. Goss, Garth Nicholas, Jean M. Seely, Harmanjatinder S. Sekhon, John Yee, Kayvan Amjadi, Jean-Claude Cutz, Diana N. Ionescu, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Simon Martel, Kamyar Soghrati, Don D. Sin, Wan C. Tan, Stefan Urbanski, Zhaolin Xu, Stuart J. Peacock, On behalf of the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Spain | 3 | 27% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,930,030
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#329
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,738
of 263,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#7
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.