| Title |
A review of the distribution of Yellowhammer (Emberiza citrinella) dialects in Europe reveals the lack of a clear macrogeographic pattern
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-014-1102-4 |
| Authors |
Tereza Petrusková, Lucie Diblíková, Pavel Pipek, Eckehard Frauendorf, Petr Procházka, Adam Petrusek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,026,528
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#152
of 1,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,286
of 356,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.