↓ Skip to main content

HIV Providers’ Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Care Settings: A Qualitative Study

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
HIV Providers’ Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Care Settings: A Qualitative Study
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10461-014-0839-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas Krakower, Norma Ware, Jennifer A. Mitty, Kevin Maloney, Kenneth H. Mayer

Abstract

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can reduce HIV incidence among at-risk persons. However, for PrEP to have an impact in decreasing HIV incidence, clinicians will need to be willing to prescribe PrEP. HIV specialists are experienced in using antiretroviral medications, and could readily provide PrEP, but may not care for HIV-uninfected patients. Six focus groups with 39 Boston area HIV care providers were conducted (May-June 2012) to assess perceived barriers and facilitators to prescribing PrEP. Participants articulated logistical and theoretical barriers, such as concerns about PrEP effectiveness in real-world settings, potential unintended consequences (e.g., risk disinhibition and medication toxicity), and a belief that PrEP provision would be more feasible in primary care clinics. They identified several facilitators to prescribing PrEP, including patient motivation and normative guidelines. Overall, participants reported limited prescribing intentions. Without interventions to address HIV providers' concerns, implementation of PrEP in HIV clinics may be limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Unknown 201 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 16 8%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 26%
Social Sciences 34 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 15%
Psychology 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 53 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,222,442
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#133
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,524
of 230,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#8
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.