You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Landscape alterations influence differential habitat use of nesting buteos and ravens within sagebrush ecosystem: Implications for transmission line development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ornithological Applications, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1650/condor-13-126.1 |
Authors |
Peter S. Coates, Kristy B. Howe, Michael L. Casazza, David J. Delehanty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 24% |
Researcher | 16 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 62% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 15% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2016.
All research outputs
#639,562
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#47
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,862
of 242,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.