↓ Skip to main content

Learning from the past to predict the future: an historical analysis of grass invasions in northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Learning from the past to predict the future: an historical analysis of grass invasions in northern Australia
Published in
Biological Invasions, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10530-014-0749-3
Authors

Rieks D. van Klinken, F. Dane Panetta, Shaun Coutts, Bryan K. Simon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 29 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 44%
Environmental Science 12 35%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,445,163
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,181
of 2,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,463
of 228,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.