↓ Skip to main content

A modulatory effect of male voice pitch on long-term memory in women: evidence of adaptation for mate choice?

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
A modulatory effect of male voice pitch on long-term memory in women: evidence of adaptation for mate choice?
Published in
Memory & Cognition, September 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13421-011-0136-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Smith, Benedict C. Jones, David R. Feinberg, Kevin Allan

Abstract

From a functionalist perspective, human memory should be attuned to information of adaptive value for one's survival and reproductive fitness. While evidence of sensitivity to survival-related information is growing, specific links between memory and information that could impact upon reproductive fitness have remained elusive. Here, in two experiments, we showed that memory in women is sensitive to male voice pitch, a sexually dimorphic cue important for mate choice because it not only serves as an indicator of genetic quality, but may also signal behavioural traits undesirable in a long-term partner. In Experiment 1, we report that women's visual object memory is significantly enhanced when an object's name is spoken during encoding in a masculinised (i.e., lower-pitch) versus feminised (i.e., higher-pitch) male voice, but that no analogous effect occurs when women listen to other women's voices. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern of results, additionally showing that lowering and raising male voice pitch enhanced and impaired women's memory, respectively, relative to a baseline (i.e., unmanipulated) voice condition. The modulatory effect of sexual dimorphism cues in the male voice may reveal a mate-choice adaptation within women's memory, sculpted by evolution in response to the dilemma posed by the double-edged qualities of male masculinity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 89 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Linguistics 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#990,441
of 24,092,222 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#67
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,079
of 128,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,092,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.