↓ Skip to main content

A national Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) of health improvement spending across Wales: disinvestment and reinvestment across the life course

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
A national Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) of health improvement spending across Wales: disinvestment and reinvestment across the life course
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Joanna M Charles, Sara Thomas, Julie Bishop, David Cohen, Sam Groves, Ciaran Humphreys, Helen Howson, Peter Bradley

Abstract

Wales faces serious public health challenges, with relatively low life expectancies and wide inequalities in life expectancy with associated pressures on the National Health Service (NHS) at a time of financial recession. This has led to growing recognition of the need to better understand the range of health improvement and prevention programmes across Welsh Government, NHS, local government and voluntary sector agencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 21%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 43 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Psychology 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 51 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,059,266
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,259
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,398
of 231,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#98
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.