↓ Skip to main content

Appendicitis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, and subsequent risk of ulcerative colitis: cohort studies in Sweden and Denmark

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appendicitis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, and subsequent risk of ulcerative colitis: cohort studies in Sweden and Denmark
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2009
DOI 10.1136/bmj.b716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morten Frisch, Bo V Pedersen, Roland E Andersson

Abstract

To determine whether the repeatedly observed low risk of ulcerative colitis after appendicectomy is related to the appendicectomy itself or the underlying morbidity, notably appendicitis or mesenteric lymphadenitis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Other 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#34,519
of 64,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,523
of 107,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#85
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.