↓ Skip to main content

Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
49 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00421-011-2141-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atle Hole Saeterbakken, Marius Steiro Fimland

Abstract

Little is known about the effect of performing common resistance exercises standing compared to seated and unilaterally compared to bilaterally on muscle activation of the core. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity (EMG) of the superficial core muscles (i.e. rectus abdominis, external oblique and erector spinae) between seated, standing, bilateral and unilateral dumbbell shoulder presses. 15 healthy males performed five repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum of the exercises in randomized order. Results were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance and a Bonferroni post hoc test. The position × exercise interaction was significantly different for rectus abdominis (P = 0.016), but not for external oblique (P = 0.100) and erector spinae (P = 0.151). The following EMG results were observed: For rectus abdominis: ~49% lower in seated bilateral versus unilateral (P < 0.001), similar in standing bilateral versus unilateral (P = 0.408), ~81% lower in bilateral seated versus standing (P < 0.001), ~59% lower in unilateral seated versus standing (P < 0.001); For external oblique: ~81% lower in seated bilateral versus unilateral (P < 0.001), ~68% lower in standing bilateral than unilateral (P < 0.001), ~58% lower in bilateral seated versus standing (P < 0.001), ~28% lower in unilateral seated versus standing (P = 0.002); For erector spinae: similar in seated bilateral versus unilateral (P = 0.737), ~18% lower in standing bilateral versus unilateral (P = 0.001), similar in seated versus standing bilateral (P = 0.480) and unilateral (P = 0.690). In conclusion, to enhance neuromuscular activation of the superficial core muscles, standing exercises should be used instead of seated exercises, and unilateral exercises should be used instead of bilateral exercises.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 21%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 52 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#353,741
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#79
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,246
of 135,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.