| Title |
Increased Mortality Associated With Digoxin in Contemporary Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Findings From the TREAT-AF Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mintu P. Turakhia, Pasquale Santangeli, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Xiangyan Xu, Aditya J. Ullal, Claire T. Than, Susan Schmitt, Tyson H. Holmes, Susan M. Frayne, Ciaran S. Phibbs, Felix Yang, Donald D. Hoang, P. Michael Ho, Paul A. Heidenreich |
| Abstract |
Despite endorsement of digoxin in clinical practice guidelines, there exist limited data on its safety in atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 24% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| Peru | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 17% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 22% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 147 | 61% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#369,164
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#862
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,108
of 240,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#10
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.