↓ Skip to main content

Pyroclastic flow erosion and bulking processes: comparing field-based vs. modeling results at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Pyroclastic flow erosion and bulking processes: comparing field-based vs. modeling results at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00445-014-0858-y
Authors

Julien Bernard, Karim Kelfoun, Jean-Luc Le Pennec, Silvia Vallejo Vargas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Trinidad and Tobago 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Researcher 17 23%
Lecturer 5 7%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 57%
Unspecified 5 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,289,862
of 24,970,913 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#857
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,505
of 236,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.